This is not a faraway dispute in lands of which we know little. It is something of great significance to every internationally open economy, such as Britain, which relies heavily on international trade to maintain its standard of living.
The China-US nexus is the key dual economic relationship on Earth today, obviously dwarfing the UK-EU spat. If China and the US had continued with their tit-for-tat imposition of tariff and quota barriers on trade it would have created a downward spiral for global growth that might have run out of control. As in the 1930s, when the great economic powers pursued competitive devaluation and protectionism, the US-China spat ran the severe risk of tilting the world into a protracted depression.
Good news, then: after almost a year of dispute, their trade war is coming to an end. And with that comes a fresh opportunity to “fix” the woeful economic relationship between the world’s two largest economies: the United States and China.
Donald Trump meets the Chinese vice premier Liu He at the White House to put the finishing touches to a new deal between the superpowers. If successful, it should swiftly lead to a summit between Trump and Xi Jinping to sign everything off and enjoy a jolly nice banquet.
The profile of the deal is impressively simple. The Chinese contract to buy lots of American goods by 2025. Beijing is also supposed to allow US corporations more freedom to buy Chinese enterprises, rather than be restricted to non-controlling equity stakes and state-sanctioned joint ventures. The recent controversies surrounding software giant Huawei highlight how sensitive some sectors can be to such foreign interventions.
The deal will get Trump off China’s back and see their growth tick up again with a boost to confidence. It will help Trump by creating US jobs, just as he promised in his 2016 election campaign. There are plenty of criticisms that can be made about the deal – it is effectively distorting market forces – and there are doubts about whether China will deliver too. But for now it is one of the few signs of hope on the global economic scene.
The Trump administration gambled, and at least partially won; it should be given some credit for that. It seems to have been a product of the typical Trump way of “negotiating” – start a fight, throw out some insulting tweets and then magnanimously offer to make peace. This must be the way to get ahead in the Manhattan real estate market. In any case, it is a big, beautiful deal the president has won.
It is too easily forgotten that the financial crash of 2008 and the global recession that followed had its origins in the incomprehensibly large trade deficits the Americans ran with China, and the correspondingly unfeasible quantity of US government debt that had been accumulated by the authorities in Beijing. These global imbalances fuelled the unsustainable lending practices of western banks, particularly into the property sector.
Behind that was a number of disputed factors, but undeniable was the simple reality that the Chinese were able to manufacture anything from smartphones and dog food to “Make America Great Again” baseball caps at considerably less cost than the US. Throw in a bit of currency manipulation – keeping the Chinese yuan down to ensure exports were competitive – and you have China’s impressive growth record.
Now, though, the two sides have peered over the abyss of a potential decade-long economic war of attrition and drawn back from the brink. There is, perhaps, a lesson there for Brexit too.
For starters, I would like to say a few words in defence of Attorney General William Barr. He is being much maligned, even vilified, as a mumbling, bumbling, dissembling, lying apologist for President Donald Trump. And I just want to note for the record that America’s 85th attorney general
President Donald Trump wasn’t kidding a couple weeks ago when he said: “We’re fighting all subpoenas.” He was answering a question then about the House Judiciary Committee’s demand for documents and testimony from former White House Counsel Don McGahn, who figured prominently in special counsel
The United Arab Emirates has expressed its deep regret and condemnation of the recognition by the United States of the Syrian Golan Heights as sovereign Israeli territory, describing it as a move that disrupts all efforts to achieve a lasting peace in the Middle East.
The heartless killing of several people late on Sunday in a triple suicide bombing in northeast Nigeria is yet another act of cowardice and barbarism by terrorists. Innocent civilians continue to suffer from indiscriminate attacks by militants in Nigeria and the matter should not be taken lightly anymore. The latest attack bears the hallmarks of the dreaded
Can you imagine how many stories newspapers, social media, and other media portals publish every day? What about videos, tweets, social media posts, text messages, mobile applications chat and daily phone conversations online. How can we keep track of the amount of data that we produce every day? There are 2.5 quintillion bytes of data created
At Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s inaugural five years ago, heads of governments of the South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC) were the chief guests. At his second inaugural last month, the chief guests were heads of governments of the Bay of Bengal Initiative for Multi-Sectoral Technical and Economic Cooperation (BIMSTEC).
When Democratic Gov. Jay Inslee last month signed a law creating a new health plan alternative for Washington state residents, many accounts proclaimed Washington to be the first state with a “public option.” But the term is difficult to define — even the word “public” is slippery in the context of health care. “Public option means the government