As the government and people of the UAE continue to stand resolute and live well through the ongoing war, the nation finds itself facing a different kind of assault. It is not new, yet under these circumstances, it is particularly striking that the UAE must defend itself not only against missiles, but also against the relentless barrage of Western media — much of which has seen fit to mobilize against its achievements and, at times, revel in its hardship.
In 2012, in the early years of my tenure as Editor-in-Chief of the Gulf Today newspaper, I witnessed the rise of this now-familiar phenomenon — a wave of Dubai-bashing that gained momentum during the depths of the financial crisis. In response, I wrote a piece titled “An Open Letter to The Guardian.” It was prompted by the newspaper’s editorial predicting Dubai’s demise. I was struck by the audacity of its claims — largely speculative, heavily opinionated, and lacking substantive context. More disheartening still was seeing respected journalistic institutions, ones I had long admired and learned from, descend toward tabloid-like standards in their eagerness to undermine a young nation steadily asserting itself on the global stage.
At a time when the internet was still a small sphere — far from the vast universe it has since become — Western media quickly learned that any headline bearing the word “Dubai” drew attention, engagement, and profit.
I laboured over that piece because it responded to an editorial that, while written from a distance, carried the weight of certainty. In doing so, it set an unprofessional precedent — one that effectively opened the floodgates for others to follow. It became lucrative, after all. In the process, it also projected a distorted image of the UAE — one that has since been dismantled not through rebuttal alone, but through sustained achievement and resilience. Today, Western media no longer observes from afar. It operates within the UAE itself. The country is home to over 3,000 media companies, including regional hubs for global institutions such as CNN, BBC News, Bloomberg, Reuters, and AP. The reason is evident: the UAE values transparency, believes in the role of journalism, and remains open to scrutiny.
The UAE has borne the brunt of this US-Israel-Iran war, defending itself against more than 2,000 missiles. Yet, rather than reporting on the scale of this assault, or the effectiveness of the nation’s defence systems, segments of Western media have reverted to familiar tropes: apocalyptic projections of economic collapse
Which makes it all the more perplexing that, nearly 14 years after writing that letter, I find myself responding to the same tired narrative. Much has changed. The UAE has advanced across virtually every sector, broken records, and addressed its shortcomings. Yet the coverage — repetitive and abundant — remains unchanged. Its language is stagnant, its structure predictable. What was once merely reductive has now, in this moment, become both careless and insensitive.
The UAE has borne the brunt of this US-Israel-Iran war, defending itself against more than 2,000 missiles — more than any other country drawn into the conflict. Yet, rather than reporting on the scale of this assault, or the effectiveness of the nation’s defence systems, segments of Western media have reverted to familiar tropes: apocalyptic projections of economic collapse.
This, while overlooking the government’s concerted efforts to safeguard citizens and residents, maintain operational airspace under fire, and support financial systems and businesses. Life in the UAE has continued — measured, cautious, but intact. Yet the narrative exported to the world has been one of disorder and fear, disconnected from reality.
At one point, the BBC reportedly reviewed hundreds of videos in an attempt to challenge residents’ accounts of safety — only to publish without conclusive findings. Consider the imbalance: time and resources spent constructing doubt where none was substantiated. Dubai’s success, it seems, has a peculiar ability to unsettle even the most established media institutions, at times reducing them to little more than click-hungry influencers — often at the expense of journalistic standards. The UAE is not alone in being affected by this war, yet the fixation on its supposed fragility persists. The same question that lingered in 2012 remains unanswered in 2026: why? Why does the idea of this nation’s collapse continue to captivate? Why do established institutions persist in advancing a narrative so visibly at odds with reality? And why is the lens so narrowly fixed here, when the global economic strain is universal?
The war has exacted a toll on the region and will inevitably shape the wider world. And so, once again, it falls upon those of us who have witnessed this country repeatedly defy such predictions to say this: rise above the pursuit of clicks. Move beyond the comfort of recycled narratives. Report the UAE as it is experienced — by the people who live it.