‘Sorry’ is one word, why are we so bad at apologising?

Olivia Petter, The Independent

Saying “sorry” is easy. It’s just one word, two syllables. You can say it faster than you can sneeze. Meaning it, however, is a lot harder. According to research commissioned by the language-learning platform Babbel, Britons have 15 uses for the word, with just one of them meaning regret. So seemingly sorry are we all the time that we don’t even know what it means any more. Here are some of the ways we’re using “sorry” incorrectly: to ask someone to move out of the way. To ask someone to repeat themselves. To show empathy. To express disbelief. To disagree. To mock. And, if we’re British, to preface literally any sentence ever.

“In British English, ‘sorry’ has evolved beyond its original role as an expression of remorse,” explains Noël Wolf, cultural and linguistic expert at Babbel, whose research also found that we use the word “sorry” an average of nine times a day. “It now serves as a social lubricant and a flexible tool of communication used in all sorts of everyday interactions.” It also reflects our nationwide desire to avoid conflict by way of old-fashioned, sturdy politeness. We keep calm and carry on, as is the British way. “In a culture where directness can feel impolite, and personal space, both emotional and physical, is protected, ‘sorry’ can smooth over moments of friction, no matter how minor,” says Wolf.

The problem with such an overuse of the word is that it has become diluted beyond recognition, and now we’re unsure how to apologise properly for something that actually warrants remorse. How can any of us truly be sorry if we don’t know how to say it? If we’re saying it too much, does the word even mean anything any more? And why do so many of us resort to insipid platitudes when apologising? Few sentences are more grating to hear than “Sorry if I upset you...”

These are some of the questions asked by Marjorie Ingall and Susan McCarthy in their book Getting to Sorry: The Art of Apology at Work and at Home, which examines the reasons why we might be wired to apologise badly, in both our professional and our personal lives, and why it’s holding us back from having meaningful relationships with others – and with ourselves. A central tenet of their argument relates to the rise of celebrity apologies: public statements made via social media, or representatives, that are designed to enshrine the celebrity’s reputation by minimising bad behaviour. Or occasionally denying it altogether.

We’ve seen this play out countless times in the public eye, with everyone from Drew Barrymore and Lena Dunham to Ashton Kutcher and Mila Kunis issuing statements to address allegations against them. Not to mention Britain’s endless list of terribly sorry politicians. Often, the apologies are long-winded, PR-executed masterpieces. Occasionally, they’re laughably weak and serve as the jumping-off point for an entirely new genre of meme; there are, in fact, several lists compiling the “worst celebrity apologies”.

“They tend to centre the person apologising rather than the people receiving the apology,” says Ingall. “Rarely do they say exactly what they’re apologising for, making them sound fake and like clear attempts to squirm out of trouble rather than a legitimate attempt to make amends.” The result, Ingall posits, is that they set a precedent for apologising badly; for finding every excuse possible to shift the blame and avoid taking accountability, in a bid to protect our reputation – as if we, too, have a globally recognised public image to consider.

“This is because our brains are designed to protect us, to help us see ourselves as the hero of our own story,” explains Ingall. “If we didn’t think we were decent people, it would be hard to get through the day. This means that when we’re faced with the cognitive dissonance of ‘I’m a good person but I did a bad thing’, we tend to fix that uncomfortable dissonance by telling ourselves what we did wasn’t really that awful, that we don’t really have to apologise, and that the other person always overreacts.”