Guy Faulconbridge and Catherine Evans, Reuters
British Prime Minister Boris Johnson will have to fight on Wednesday to defend his premiership after it was revealed a “bring your own bottle” gathering was held at his official residence during the first coronavirus lockdown. Opposition lawmakers have called for Johnson to resign and some in his own Conservative Party have said he should quit if he is found to have broken strict laws his government brought in to prevent the spread of the virus.
Johnson, who swept to power in 2019 on a promise to secure Britain’s exit from the European Union, has so far refused to say whether he attended the gathering in Downing Street on May 20, 2020. “His survival is in the balance at the moment,” said one senior Conservative lawmaker, speaking on condition of anonymity due to the sensitivity of the situation. “He has got to make a clean breast. I usually find that if you make your apologies, it defuses the issue. Can’t have it hanging on,” said the lawmaker.
The prime minister and his partner Carrie mingled with about 40 staff in the garden of Downing Street after his Principal Private Secretary Martin Reynolds sent an invitation by email using the pronoun “we”, ITV News reported. Johnson’s spokesman has repeatedly refused to comment on the details of the report. When Johnson fields questions in parliament on Wednesday at 1200 GMT, there is just one issue that lawmakers will want an answer to: was he at the drinks party or not?
Newspapers, including those which are usually very sympathetic to Johnson, warned that unless he resolved the issue, his position could become untenable. On its front page, the Daily Mail posed the question many commentators were asking after the recent scandal: “Is the party over for PM?”
“If he has lied to the British public and lied to parliament and attended parties during lockdown then his position is untenable,” the main opposition Labour Party’s deputy leader Angela Rayner said. “Many people who lost loved ones over that period and were not able to see them are devastated by this news that Number 10 was partying while their loved ones died alone. This is completely unacceptable.”
Since the details of the gathering emerged, Johnson has simply said he could not comment until a senior government official, Sue Gray, concludes an internal investigation.
The revelation about the Downing Street gathering follows other allegations of rule-breaking by Johnson and his officials and a series of unrelated mis-steps and scandals. Gray is already looking into other possibly illegal gatherings after a video emerged showing his staff laughing and joking about a different party held in Downing Street during a 2020 Christmas lockdown. In December, the Guardian newspaper published a photograph of Johnson and more than a dozen other people drinking wine in the Downing Street garden which it said was also taken in May 2020 during the COVID-19 lockdown.
Johnson has previously told parliament that all COVID-19 guidance had been followed, no rules had been broken and that there had been no party in Downing Street. A snap poll by Savanta ComRes on Tuesday showed 66% now thought Johnson should resign, up 12 percentage points from a poll taken in December after the reports of Christmas parties. Last month, the Conservatives lost a parliamentary seat they had held for almost 200 years while the party’s comfortable lead in opinion polls over Labour has also evaporated.
Each casualty of the virus lost an average of 10 years of life when they died, according to an analysis by respected think tank the Health Foundation.
A leading scientist has defended the government’s decision to describe the new coronavirus variant as more deadly after others claimed the proof is still vague. There is some evidence that a new coronavirus variant first identified in southeast England
“Our priority has always been getting children back into school which we know is crucial for their education and wellbeing. We’ll also be prioritising ways for people to reunite with loved ones safely.”
It’s unscientific and unfair, but journalists, like anyone, often have to form a judgement about the accuracy of something based on whether it has “the ring of truth” about it, based on past experience, known patterns of behaviour and the credibility of the
The United Supreme Court has on Thursday delivered a controversial 6-3 verdict overturning a 1913 New York law restricting the carrying of handguns in public, saying that it is part of the Second Amendment to the US Constitution, forming the basis of fundamental rights. The Second Amendment ratified
Six years ago I made a terrible, terrible mistake. I voted Leave. I thought Brexit would work, or at least could work and create the conditions to build a more competitive economy, and therefore a more prosperous one. I’d been watching the 2016 Euros and drew inspiration from them. Every team had
At one point in Al Gore’s seminal 2006 film “An Inconvenient Truth,” the former vice president laments that his tobacco-farming parents didn’t stop raising tobacco until after their beloved daughter Nancy died of lung cancer in Tennessee. “It’s just human nature to take time to connect the dots,” Gore says
In an extremely important church-and-state decision, the Supreme Court has held that if the state of Maine decides to pay for a child’s private education in lieu of a public one, it must allow its tuition money to be used at religious schools. The 6-3 decision, Carson v. Makin, profoundly undermines existing First