Boris Johnson, Priti Patel.
Alistair Carmichael, The Independent
There’s a nasty spectre looming over Refugee Week this year. As we celebrate the incredible contributions refugees make to our country, and as we recognise that far more must be done to protect the 30 million refugees and asylum seekers around the world, we are also bracing ourselves for the arrival of Priti Patel’s new “Borders Bill”.
This is the legislation that will enact the Conservatives’ plans to make it harder for people to claim asylum in the UK. No matter how desperate your situation, no matter what forced you to flee your home, no matter if there’s nowhere else for you to go, this government seemingly wants to punish you if you come to the UK having travelled through another “safe” country.
What form could that punishment take? In theory, the government may try to “remove” you to another “safe” country. In practice, you may be trapped in limbo for months before the Home Office even starts processing your asylum claim, after which you move into purgatory for several more months while officials decide your fate.
If you are deemed a genuine refugee — as around 70 per cent of asylum seekers in the UK are — you will be given only a new “temporary protection status”. The government will reassess you every couple of years to see if it can “remove” you from the country. Your rights to sponsor close family members to join you will be restricted, and your children won’t be eligible for child benefit or free school meals.
So how does Priti Patel justify this extraordinary cruelty to some of the world’s most vulnerable people? She says it’s to stop them from crossing the Channel in small boats, and tackle the people smugglers and human traffickers who often orchestrate those crossings — and that’s a goal we all share.
The problem is, nothing in the home secretary’s Borders Bill will actually help achieve that goal. There is absolutely no evidence that treating asylum seekers more harshly when they get here will stop them from trying to come.
After all, the Home Office has been treating asylum seekers abysmally for years: keeping them in unsafe and unsuitable accommodation, forcing them to wait months for a decision on their claim, banning them from working or renting a home, forcing them to live on just £5.66 a day. If cruelty and bureaucracy were the answer, the Home Office would have solved this problem long ago.
The real solution is the one thing Priti Patel is so far refusing to do: provide safe and legal routes for refugees to come to the UK. Only by doing that will we stop people being desperate enough to put their lives in the hands of smugglers, cram themselves into small boats and attempt these perilous crossings, or fall victim to the criminal gangs who traffic human beings as slaves.
The UK has a proud history of providing sanctuary to people in need: from the 10,000 Jewish children we rescued from the Nazis to the 20,000 Syrian refugees we’ve resettled since 2014, with many others in between.
But now, the Conservative government is turning its back on refugees and failing to live up to our obligations to them. They have closed the UK’s three main resettlement schemes and replaced them with a single new one.
Priti Patel says the new UK Resettlement Scheme will “continue our proud record of resettling refugees who need our help from around the world”. But in its first month — at a time when the need for resettlement is higher than ever — that new scheme resettled just 25 people, compared to more than 470 a month under the old ones.
The government must start matching its rhetoric on safe and legal routes with action.
I think it’s safe to say that I have had enough. This week, I have sat across the table from victims bringing me cases of child sexual exploitation, two rapes, a very violent gang rape, two different cases of grooming gangs and a severe incidence of
People power is back. Three of the biggest stories this week have convincingly demonstrated the force of popular protest. Plans for a European Super League lie in tatters after furious fans expressed their discontent, congregating at Stamford Bridge and Elland Road and
We begin the column with an apology to a man called Tim Loughton, an obscure MP best known for leading 2016’s “Leadsom 4 Leader” march on parliament, which remains
It is not surprising that the Delta variety, which had originated in India and which is now widespread across the world, in the Americas, in Europe, in south-east Asia, has emerged in China, first in Wuhan, the original home of COVID-19, and in Nanjing,
Political theorists, philosophers of social science, pundits and the media are essentially right to say that we live in a “post-truth” society, even world. This viewpoint has been associated with left-wing academics in the postmodernist and deconstruction
I like the internet as much as the next guy. There are a lot of useful things about it and on it. But, at the same time, I dislike the internet as much as the next guy because there’s also a lot wrong with it. The upside of the internet is also its downside.