Environment activists hold placards during an awareness walk in London.
Geraint Davies, The Independent
Replacing the provisions of the Clean Air Act 1956, created to tackle the smog of London, is something that is long overdue. Not only does the industrial city for which it was intended not exist in 2021; the bar it set – to not have air opaque with pollution – is laughably low. Most importantly, it didn’t have health at its heart.
Unfortunately, the same limited focus plagues the government’s flagship Environment Bill, which places air quality within a context of environmental problems, with the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) at its helm.
A revised version of the bill is anticipated in the wake of the report by coroner Philip Barlow, who has called for maximum levels of particulate air pollution to be lowered in the UK to be in line with World Health Organisation (WHO) limits.
Barlow ruled earlier this year that air pollution from traffic was among the causes of the death of nine-year-old Ella Kissi-Debrah in February 2013.
The heartbreaking conclusion of the inquest hearing into Ella’s death shows that urgent action is needed. Thanks to the fierce campaigning of Ella’s mother, Rosamund Kissi-Debrah, we know that the political will to deliver clean air has been sadly lacking.
Outside of the EU, we are more vulnerable – and looking ahead, the Office for Environmental Protection won’t have the teeth either. But while it might be tempting to look towards creating a new body, or gifting an existing organisation with the responsibility of air quality through a new Clean Air Bill, doing so would risk missing the opportunities that the lockdown has presented.
Now, more than ever, the public will not accept that things can’t be done, or have the economy used as a shackle to prevent the introduction of progressive environmental and health policy.
This of course is a health issue, and so alongside the need for WHO guidelines, the coroner’s report recommended that more emphasis be placed on the adverse effects of air pollution during the training of health professionals in order to equip them to communicate this to patients – especially those with respiratory illnesses.
We should go further, and have a public-facing campaign, like the government did with the COVID-19 adverts reminding people to open windows regularly to ventilate indoor environments. This is good advice at all times, especially when cooking.
The coroner also recommended more air-pollution monitors, and that information about air quality is made available to the public. It’s not hard to see how empowering parents and head teachers with this information could transform how children are taken to school – as just one example – and allow the public to make better decisions with health in mind.
For these things to happen, the Environment Bill is the torch at the start of the procession. It will set the tone on whether the government prioritises preventing deaths, like the coroner has urged – as well as indicating to other government departments and local authorities the measures that need to be taken in order for WHO guidelines to be met.
Right now, after our lifestyles have been so dramatically affected and protecting health has become a priority for all, the small shifts in behaviour that will be needed for us to achieve clean air don’t seem quite so daunting.
That’s why we need UK leadership, with an all-government effort, to deliver WHO air pollution limits as our gift to the world at COP26.
A survey experiment spanning seven countries finds high levels of support for increased action on environmental protection ahead of the 26th United Nations Climate Change Conference of the Parties. In India, where the survey represented adults in urban areas,
Countries must “call time” on coal-fired power, deforestation and new petrol cars if hopes of meeting the world’s toughest climate target are to be kept alive, the UK has warned. In little less than six months, the world is due to convene in Glasgow for a major summit
A report by research firm Verisk Maplecroft states that of the 100 most vulnerable cities to environmental risks, 43 are in India. According to the first instalment of their Cities@Risk series, which ranks the world’s 576 largest urban centres on their exposure to
Indian Union Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman announced an allocation of Rs30,300 million for the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEFCC) for the financial year 2022-23, of which Rs46,00 million were allotted towards
It did not need much guess work to know that a country holding a major sports event like the summer/winter Olympics or the football Word Cup would leave any impact on the minds of the people for a long time if the internal conditions are not friendly enough and if the country has not developed an image of being a friendly country.
Today’s immigration figures show the highest levels of net migration since records began, at about half a million over the year to June. Overwhelmingly, this reflects rising inflows from outside the EU. Unsurprisingly, this has already generated some hysterical reactions from the usual suspects. However, given trends in visas over the period
India’s Purnima Devi Barman, an Assam-based wildlife biologist, is one of the five ‘Champions of the Earth’ for this year, as announced by the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). The other honourees include Arcenciel (Lebanon); Constantino (Tino) Aucca Chutas (Peru); Sir Partha Dasgupta of the United Kingdom and Cecile
The world has faced the deadliest coronavirus, the virus that hits the world once in a hundred years, and is still posing a threat globally. It’s so important to deal with COVID-19 carefully till the World Health Organisation officially announces the end pandemic (“China COVID cases hit fresh record high,” Nov.27, Gulf Today website).