Cathy Newman, The Independent
A lot has happened since David Cameron’s Conservatives and Nick Clegg’s Liberal Democrats launched their coalition programme for government in 2010.
The former prime minister has a few little local difficulties with a financial services company. The former deputy prime minister has a new challenge on his hands with a global tech company. But some things never change and so it was that 18 words in the coalition programme for government came back to haunt the Tories this week.
The home secretary, Priti Patel, said the asylum system was “broken”. The words were far less dramatic in the coalition agreement, but the import was the same. “We will explore new ways to improve the current asylum system to speed up the processing of applications,” the Conservatives and Lib Dems agreed – in diplomatic language attempting to bridge a yawning gulf in policy on the subject.
Eleven years later, the system still needs reform. New ways to improve it are still being explored and Labour is justified in asking: if the system is broken, why has it taken the Tories the intervening eleven years to attempt to fix it?
In fact, the Home Office seems to have got worse at managing the problem during the Conservatives’ time in power. Ten years ago, there were almost 42,000 returns and removals of asylum seekers whose claims had been rejected. In 2019, that had fallen to just over 19,000.
I put that to the immigration minister, Chris Philp, on last night’s Channel 4 News. He excused the performance on the grounds that the UK’s hands were tied while we were still in the European Union.
So I asked, repeatedly, how many failed asylum applicants had been sent back across the Channel since Britain left the EU. The answer came that there was none. But in the coming weeks, we’ll all be able to see if membership of the EU is to blame for the chaos in the system, or whether the problem lies closer to home – or, indeed, the Home Office.
Patel herself pointed the finger at “lefty lawyers” and “do-gooders” in a speech, last year; accusing them of bogging everything down in “endless legal claims”. Yet, since 2008, the number of first-time appeals has actually decreased from 200,000 – to around 40,000 a year.
Meanwhile, the human cost is enormous. About 64,000 people are currently waiting in dispersal accommodation while their claims are processed. So, how to fix the problem? When the UK was in the EU, the Dublin regulation applied, meaning asylum seekers could legally be returned to the first safe country they entered. In the absence of that, or any replacement protocol, the UK must rely on bilateral deals with our “European friends”, as Boris Johnson likes to call them.
Not a single one of these has been signed but Patel tried to up the ante on Wednesday day by appealing to EU leaders’ sense of “moral duty”. The problem with this is that many argue the UK has lost the moral high ground.
Under the vulnerable persons resettlement scheme, the UK has given a home to just 20,000 Syrians displaced by war and Patel scrapped her predecessor’s annual target of 5,000 resettlement places a year. By contrast, Angela Merkel rallied her compatriots with the cry of: “We can do this!” As a result, Germany has welcomed more than half a million Syrians.
There are other foreign-policy decisions, too, which threaten to undermine a call to the Europeans to locate their morals. As his backbenchers protest that millions of Yemenis face famine, Boris Johnson rushes to insist the UK’s cuts to international aid are temporary. But it’s a far cry from the “liberal Conservative foreign policy” set out in Cameron’s touchy-feely manifesto back in 2010.
On Wednesday, Priti Patel stated in parliament that people crossing the Channel “are not genuine asylum seekers” and are only making the journey to live in UK hotels. It’s not the first time the home secretary has made harmful comments about refugees and asylum seekers.
The British prime minister who called the Brexit referendum and then saw the public vote to leave the European Union says he is sorry for the divisions it has caused.
An old, familiar face is joining thousands of migrants trying to cross into the US to seek asylum: Mexicans. A rising number of Mexican citizens are fleeing states slammed by violence
A few days ago, EU nationals in the UK were dealt another blow as Iain Duncan Smith, co-founder of the Centre for Social Justice, urged Priti Patel, the home secretary, to raise the minimum salary threshold for immigrants from £30,000 to £36,700 per year. As an EU national from Sweden who has lived and worked in the
It would seem that Chinese authorities have responded to the protests about the Covid-19 restrictions in some of the major cities because of zero-Covid 19 policy of the government. People did not only feel choked by the quarantine and testing requirements, but also by the economic disruption it had caused
There’s a photo taken a few years ago, in slightly happier times, of the then Prince Charles, Camilla, Harry and Meghan, Wills and Kate, and the grandchildren. Camilla is pointing at the camera, and little Princess Caroline is giggling. Prince George is on his grandad’s knee.
There’s a disturbing game that’s emerged on the internet in recent years, and it involves trying to catch women out. As the demand for plastic and cosmetic surgery in the US and UK rose in 2020, so did a feverish entitlement to know which celebrities have had it done. This desperation to detect the “real” from
I have torn up my Labour Party membership, having joined in 1964 when I came to London to university. I decided to leave in August after Sir Keir Starmer, as party leader, announced what I think are destructive Brexit policies. I thought I would rejoin after the party conference. However, that conference, with