Eli Lake, Tribune News Service
President Joe Biden and the Democratic Party spent the last four years warning that former president Donald Trump was compromised by Russia. Now the Biden administration has cut a deal with Moscow more favourable to Russia than the one the outgoing Trump team was trying to negotiate: Last month it extended for five years a major arms control treaty with Russia, known as New START.
Under Trump, the US strategy was to press the Russians to freeze the development of nuclear warheads for weapons systems that are not covered in the treaty, such as artillery shells and short-range missiles. Ryan Tully, the senior director for European and Russian Affairs in Trump’s National Security Council until he resigned on Jan. 6, told me that he thought the New START treaty was flawed because it “covers almost the entirety of the US deployed deterrent, but less than half of Russia’s.”
At the same time, Tully said there was a benefit to extending the treaty for another five years. Now “there will be less opportunities to extract concessions from US negotiators looking to cut a deal,” he said.
This may sound like a contradiction. But in the context of broader US policy toward Russia, it makes sense. Drawn-out arms-control negotiations can suck up precious foreign-policy bandwidth. They can also give Russia potential leverage over other aspects of the relationship. If the US pushes hard on political prisoners or Russian meddling in Ukraine, for example, Russia can threaten to walk away from New START, even though it’s in the interest of both countries to limit each other’s nuclear arsenal.
A version of this dilemma plagued the Obama administration’s first-term diplomacy with Russia. While the US tried to get Moscow to support its sanctions against Iran (which it did, eventually) and allow new supply routes through former Soviet republics for US forces in Afghanistan, it largely ignored Russia’s occupation of Georgian territory following its invasion in 2008. The administration also tried hard to block Congress from imposing new human-rights sanctions on Russian officials connected to the killing of a Russian lawyer Sergei Magnitsky.
Back then, the Russian president was Dmitri Medvedev, a technocrat whom the Obama administration wrongly believed it could work with. In contrast, there are very few areas where the Biden administration thinks it can cooperate with President Vladimir Putin.
Biden himself made this point earlier this month in an address at the State Department. “I made it clear to President Putin, in a manner very different from my predecessor, that the days of the United States rolling over in the face of Russia’s aggressive actions — interfering with our elections, cyberattacks, poisoning its citizens — are over,” Biden said.
This is a welcome sign. For now, the Biden administration is awaiting an intelligence community review of Russia policy before unveiling more detailed initiatives. Areas under review include allegations that Russia paid bounties for US soldiers in Afghanistan; the recent Solar Winds hack; Russian interference in US elections; and the poisoning of dissident Alexey Navalny.
The new administration will almost certainly discover what most careful observers of the Trump administration have known for a while: The previous administration’s policies were often at odds with the former president’s tweets and public ramblings.
There were times when Trump declined to follow the advice of his government experts. One former senior official told me that a set of new sanctions on Russia for the poisoning of Navalny was awaiting Trump’s approval when he left office. Navalny’s organization has also provided the Biden administration with a list of corrupt Putin cronies that it recommends placing on a financial blacklist.
All of this is to say that Biden has many options for making good on his promise of a tough Russia policy. By avoiding an arms-control negotiation with Moscow, the president has also removed a powerful temptation to weaken those policies.
US President Joe Biden’s invitation to Vladimir Putin to hold a summit was being hailed in Moscow as a sign that Washington had blinked first in the showdown with Russia over Ukraine. With indications that work was already under way for a potential
"We will respond to this measure in a tit-for-tat manner. We will ask ten US diplomats in Russia to leave the country," Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov told reporters.
He also said that President Vladimir Putin's top foreign policy aide, Yury Ushakov, had recommended that US envoy John Sullivan leave for Washington to conduct "serious consultations."
Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said that Russia would publish a list of US officials who will be blacklisted. But he said Moscow was "studying" US President Joe Biden's proposal to hold a summit with Putin.
The US government blacklisted Russian companies, expelled Russian diplomats and barred US banks from buying sovereign bonds from Russia's central bank, national wealth fund and finance ministry.
US Secretary of State Antony Blinken left on Sunday for a trip focused on the future of the Arctic, a source of growing tension with China and a test of the strained US relationship with Russia ahead of an expected Biden-Putin summit meeting. Blinken was travelling
This morning, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi hoisted the national flag from the wall of the Red Fort in New Delhi and, in a televised address to his 1.39 billion countrymen and women, eulogised the advances the country has made over the past 75 years.
When Vince Gilligan first announced that his next project after Breaking Bad would be Better Call Saul, I remember thinking to myself “well, it was nice while it lasted.” The hubris of trying to make a follow-up to what is easily one of the most perfect TV shows ever made is bad enough, but a prequel set before any of
India’s impressive medal haul of 66 with 22 gold, 16 silver and 23 bronze in the Birmingham Commonwealth Games came as a boost as the country was celebrating its 75th Year of Independence. It seemed that India is emerging as a sporting nation and not just an emerging economic power and an admirable
As California prepares to update its low carbon fuel standard — a policy aiming to reduce emissions from transportation fuels — Indigenous groups and environmentalists across the Midwest are fighting one of its key provisions. The policy would incentivize ethanol production through technology that stores