Central American migrants stand in line before entering a temporary shelter, after illegally crossing the border between Mexico and the US, in Deming, New Mexico, US. File/Reuters
Francis Wilkinson, Tribune News Service
It takes a strong stomach to be a “Dreamer,” and it probably will even after President Donald Trump leaves office.
The Department of Homeland Security this week said it would accept new applicants for the first time in three years to the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, known as DACA. The programme was devised by President Barack Obama in 2012 to allow undocumented immigrants who came to the US as children the chance to build a life in their only real homeland. (According to one survey, the average age at which a “Dreamer” arrived in the US was 6.) As Vox’s Dara Lind wrote in 2017, DACA enabled “Dreamers” to plan for the future and “freed them from some of the mental health damage that constant deportation stress can cause.”
Widely popular, DACA nonetheless immediately came under siege. The programme, which includes more than 600,000 people, has spent the better part of a decade on a roller coaster ride through the federal judiciary and around the hairpin turns of Trump’s anti-immigrant pursuits. In 2017, the Trump administration stopped accepting new applicants to the programme and established a schedule for phasing out protection for those who were already covered.
The Supreme Court, ruling 5-4 with Ruth Bader Ginsburg still on the bench, voided that plan in June, declaring that the Department of Homeland Security hadn’t properly followed federal procedures. A federal judge last month ruled that the department’s subsequent effort was also illegal, having been signed by an acting department head, Chad Wolf, who lacked legal authority. In other words, DACA hangs by the thread of Trump administration incompetence.
The department this week said it would recommence granting work permits and deportation deferrals to allow qualified applicants to work, study, obtain drivers’ licenses and gain professional credentials. (Last month, Jin Park of Harvard University became the first “Dreamer” to earn a Rhodes Scholarship. DACA status will enable him to travel legally back and forth to Oxford.)
Reprieves for “Dreamers” are invariably temporary, however, and this one is no different. There is still a case in federal court in which Texas and a handful of other states are suing to cancel DACA. America’s Voice, an immigration advocacy organisation, predicts that the conservative judge in the case will rule against DACA.
Next year will mark the 20th anniversary of the first “Dreamer” bill introduced in Congress. Even if President-elect Joe Biden manages another temporary rescue of DACA, the past two decades of flailing to produce a just solution for “Dreamers” represents a grave indictment of American political dysfunction.
A decade ago this month, the Senate nearly passed a Dream Act after the House had already done so. Six Democrats joined all but three Republicans in opposing it as it was filibustered into submission. The bill’s failure was an act of national self-sabotage: The US was in effect taking in children, investing in their educations, raising them to adulthood and then deciding that, all things considered, it preferred not to earn a return on its social and financial investment. Instead, the US would rather limit their potential, along with the social and economic gains that Americans would collectively realize.
The damage extends. Most “Dreamers” are integrated into American families. They have American siblings, spouses or children. By limiting “Dreamers,” America limits those family members too.
“Does anybody really want to throw out good, educated and accomplished young people who have jobs, some serving in the military?” Trump asked in 2017, at a moment when he was pretending to be part of the broad American mainstream that supports legal status for “Dreamers.” It was a rhetorical question, of course. The real answer is pretty alarming.
The Biden administration should avoid the Trump-era mistake of reducing the entirety of the US-Mexico relationship to the single issue of immigration. The administration has made Vice President Kamala Harris its point person at the southern border, and she has been
America’s government — from the White House to the halls of Congress to the judicial benches — must treat this influx of asylum-seekers from Haiti and South and Central America as a refugee crisis. Refugees should be met at our border and provided humane, sanitary and safe conditions while they are processed by our judicial court process
Even as the US Supreme Court ruled that Title 42, which was invoked by president Donald Trump in March 2020 in the wake of Covid restricting asylum-seekers from entering the United States, Reuters news agency reported that President Joe Biden administration officials are planning to expel asylum-seekers from specific countries
The Americans have no doubt that the Chinese balloon was a spy balloon, especially after it changed its course from flying over Canadian territory to the north and crossed over into the United States, and passed over Nebraska and Idaho, where sensitive nuclear and missile bases are located. According to American intelligence
Is Liz Truss really having a “comeback”? Things move pretty fast these days but does a “comeback” not require the person coming back to have first gone away for a considerably longer time than Liz Truss has managed? Take That waited a full decade before their “comeback”, and they did so with a whole load of new material
A United Nations Food and Agricultural Organisation report, highlighted by Mongabay-India, says that the Indigenous food system of the Khasi community in Nongtraw village in the north-eastern state of Meghalaya, India, offers lessons in climate resilience and sustainable food systems. The UN’s Food and Agricultural Organisation
The opinion article ‘The digital age is destroying the art of the letter’ published in Gulf Today website on Feb.5, is genuinely what exists in present-day life. I would more than agree that letter writing is a dying art. Right from birth, the digital invasion in life is tuning the human brain to a different angle to adjust to the new age syndrome,