Photo has been used for illustrative purposes.
Thomas Hale, The Independent
Governments across the world have responded in radically different ways to the COVID-19 crisis. Some are denying its seriousness. Some are blaming others. More and more are enacting restrictions on personal freedoms that are without precedent in peacetime. To defeat the virus, governments need to take a strictly evidence-based approach in order to learn rapidly from all countries’ experience. That will require cooperation and coordination.
Until now, systematic information on how and when governments are adopting policy responses has been lacking. That’s why at the University of Oxford we have mobilised our diverse student community – able to read policy developments in virtually all countries’ primary languages – to build the world’s first comprehensive tracking system: the Oxford COVID-19 Government Response Tracker.
Everywhere debates are raging about the response to COVID-19. Governments are under immense scrutiny. And yet we see pundits, commentators, and officials making simple comparisons, arguing that their country should follow the “Singaporean model”, or perhaps that a “Lombard lockdown” is preferable to a “Wuhan-style” quarantine.
Rarely do these comparisons consider how or why a certain approach worked in a certain place. Without orderly data and careful empirical analysis, the drumbeat of COVID-19 commentary will make it hard for decision-makers around the world to make the best possible choices.
For the last two weeks, several dozen Oxford students, faculty, and staff have been scanning government websites and news sources across the world to measure governments’ responses across eleven indicators, such as school closings, bans on public events, and travel restrictions. From this information we have constructed a statistical index that measures the stringency of governments’ responses from 0 to 100 over time, with higher scores indicating stronger responses. All of our data is freely accessible online, and we will continue to update it as the crisis unfolds.
At the time of writing, some countries are now at close to the top of our index, even in places where the number of confirmed cases remains low, like Croatia, Serbia, or Qatar. Others, like Brazil or Sweden, have not yet enacted measures as stringent as many of their neighbours.
We also see many differences in how quickly governments increase stringency. Some, like South Korea, have increased the stringency of their responses rapidly as the number of cases rose. Others, like the United Kingdom and the United States, have waited longer.
Over the coming weeks we will be able to measure the consequences of these different choices, looking at the relationship between policy measures and the spread of the SARS-CoV-2 virus that causes COVID-19. Aggregate indices cannot, of course, tell the full story. So we are also looking to include additional indicators and sub-national data (for example, regional or local government responses) to the database.
Going forward, cooperation will be critical. Facing a disease that exploits our connections, the instinct of many governments – and of many people – is to sever ties with others. Indeed, many of the policy actions that comprise our index are about eliminating physical opportunities for the virus to spread. But at the same time we need to forge working links with each other, both in our communities and across borders, to understand and respond to the crisis effectively.
We have seen a small but effective example of the power of cooperation in Oxford these last weeks. Though physically separated, students, staff, and academics across many disciplines, from dozens of countries, speaking a multitude of languages, have come together to volunteer their time to map our responses to a common foe. Now we need governments to adopt a similar spirit of rapid, radical collaboration.
There seems to be some heartening news after months of distress caused by the COVID-19 pandemic across the globe. Early data from trials of three potential COVID-19 vaccines released on Monday,
Sarah Gilbert is a professor of vaccinology at the University of Oxford and leads a team of researchers in developing a vaccine for the coronavirus, which has so far infected more than 1.7 million worldwide.
A year into the pandemic, infection rates are falling. Hospitals are quieter; morgues are emptier. Emboldened by vaccines, we’re dropping our masks and stepping closer. Slowly we’re reopening indoor dining, theaters, museums and schools.
The Opec+ has decided in the meeting of its Joint Ministerial Monitoring Committee (JMMC) in Vienna on Wednesday to cut production by two million barrels per day. Opec+ sources said that the cut was necessitated more by lack of demand than to boost oil prices. The crude prices had dropped from $120 to $90, and the Opec+
Since World War II, 30 prime ministers have presided over the 67 governments that have marked Italy’s uniquely unstable political life. On Sept. 25, Italians elected Giorgia Meloni, leader of the far-right Brothers of Italy party, into power. Meloni will be the first woman to lead the country, but she will also be the nation’s only prime minister to
A chance to bring the continent together in the face of Russian aggression or an empty talking shop of squabbling rivals? There are major questions over the prospects — and purpose — of the,” European Political Community” summit being launched in Prague on Thursday. The one-day gathering — a brainchild of French President Emmanuel
Sprawled on rocky ground far from sea ice, a lone Canadian polar bear sits under a dazzling sun, his white fur utterly useless as camouflage. It’s mid-summer on the shores of Hudson Bay and life for the enormous male has been moving in slow motion, far from the prey that keeps him alive: seals. This is a critical time for the region’s polar bears.