Louis Staples, The Independent
American socialists were given some good news this week when Bernie Sanders, hot off the heels of a stellar debate performance, received some of the most sought-after endorsements of the primary race. Congresswoman Ilhan Omar, one quarter of “the Squad” – a group of four Democratic Congresswoman of colour who have been vilified by President Trump a number of times – officially endorsed Sanders for president and released a video explaining her reasons. It has been widely reported that fellow Squad members Rashida Tlaib and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez will publicly follow suit this weekend.
To receive endorsements from the youngest woman ever elected to congress (Ocasio-Cortez) and the first Muslim women elected to congress (Omar and Tlaib) is a major coup for Sanders, whose supporters are often unfairly and inaccurately characterised as being white, male “Bernie bros”. But in politics, when someone chooses to publicly endorse a candidate can be just as revealing as the endorsement itself. And the timing of these endorsements signals that, at this stage in the campaign, Sanders isn’t doing as well as he’d hoped.
It is unusual for prominent figures within the Democratic party to endorse candidates this early in a primary contest. As it stands, the primary is essentially a three-horse race between Sanders, Elizabeth Warren and Joe Biden, but there are still over 10 candidates seeking the nomination. The bulk of endorsements – particularly high-profile, influential ones – tend to come when there are two distinctly different candidates remaining. But even then, it’s not uncommon for leading Democrats to stay quiet. Warren, for example, didn’t publicly pick between Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders in 2016. Neither did then-president Barack Obama (despite the fact that he reportedly begged Clinton, his former secretary of state, to run for the position).
Political endorsements are a fascinating tool. If timed right, they can be a devastating blow to an opponent that creates a ripple effect across politics. High-profile Democrats, many of them Clinton allies, informing Hillary that they intended to endorse Obama was said to be the final nail in her 2008 campaign’s coffin, convincing her to drop out soon after.
The odd timing of these endorsements could mean one of two things: one is that the Sanders campaign desperately needs a boost. With his public health issues and stagnation in the polls, Sanders needs to show people he’s back in the game and ready to fight on. The other is that the Squad suspect Sanders won’t win the nomination, and want to leave some distance between now and the moment they throw their backing behind another Democrat – probably Liz Warren – to unite the party ahead of 2020’s showdown with Trump.
Warren’s place in all of this is equally intriguing. Known as the women with “a plan” for everything, she seemingly hasn’t bothered writing a healthcare plan because she’s such a fan of Sanders’. So she will no doubt be disappointed that she could not win the endorsement of these progressive Congresswomen. Still, Ayanna Pressley – the fourth member of the Squad – represents a district in Massachusetts, the state Warren represents in the Senate. Perhaps she’ll be able to convince her?
Either way, the early timing of these endorsements might actually boost Warren’s appeal as the “compromise candidate” between Biden and Sanders. In six months’ time, it’s possible the Squad might be publicly endorsing her to bring Democrats together. Bernie Sanders may well be the collateral damage in a wider strategy which celebrates his achievements before ultimately leaving him behind.
Regardless of what happens in the future, these influential progressives choosing this moment to throw their backing behind Sanders tells us a lot about what’s happening right now. Sanders choosing to play one of his trump cards so early in the game hints that he might not be happy with his position in the race, so he’s chosen to up the ante.
The next Democratic presidential debate will be held one night only and include all ten remaining candidates onstage, including the frontrunners Joe Biden, Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders.
There had been a lot of talk going into the debate in America’s Motor City that the two highest profile progressives might not engage in hand-to-hand combat. What was the sense, pundits said, of Elizabeth Warren attacking Bernie Sanders, or of him attacking her. Given they were both seeking to appeal to many
Americans are once again interested in debating economic systems. The 2016 presidential candidacy of Bernie Sanders, a self-described socialist, reignited a debate about capitalism and socialism that some believed had died with the Soviet Union. Younger Americans are now divided on which system
Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren are Senate colleagues, ideological partners and mutual admirers. But their tacit alliance in the 2020 Democratic presidential primary is approaching a breaking point as they vie to become the progressive alternative to front-runner Joe Biden. More than five months out from the Iowa caucuses,
Countries around the world are agonising over new coronavirus curbs ahead of Christmas and other holidays as global infections approach 60 million. It’s going to be a totally different ‘festive’ season this time – without some of the traditional
Many of my fellow Democrats have spent the past four weeks aghast at the reality that more than 73 million of our co-citizens saw fit to vote for the reelection of Donald Trump. “How could they do that?” we ask. After four years of his presidency,
So, when are you getting married then?” He starts to hum the Wedding March. “Well Grandpa, I’m single, in lockdown and we are in the middle of a pandemic, so… probably not soon.” “You will be like Din Joe. We always asked him