The photo has been used for illustrative purposes.
Tasnim Nazeer, The independent
Another year, another row over secularism and the hijab in France. This time, the debate erupted after a far-right politician asked a woman who was accompanying her son and other children on a school trip to a regional council headquarters to remove her headscarf when entering the building. It is a reminder that, for all our progress, Islamophobia is still rife – in France, and right across Europe.
As a Muslim woman who wears a headscarf, it is really frustrating and obviously upsetting to face discrimination just for following the tenets of my faith. I know too well the pain of experiencing Islamophobia first hand in the UK. I have been verbally abused and harassed by members of the public just because my faith is visible to them.
The Muslim mother targeted in this instance was also left in tears, in front of her child, after being publicly humiliated by Julien Odoul, a member of Marine Le Pen’s National Rally (RN) party, who said he was acting on behalf of “secular principles in the wake of killings by a radicalised extremist”.
This excuse is unacceptable. There is nothing in French law that stipulates that women are not allowed to wear the hijab in or outside school gates while accompanying classes on outings. What happened was this: a woman that wanted to take part in her son’s school trip was deliberately victimised in an attempt to keep visible Muslims out of sight and deter Islamic integration into French society.
Remarkably, many ministers of Emmanuel Macron’s centrist government backed the stance of the politician, claiming defence of French secularism. Luckily, others within the same government quite rightly disagreed, citing that this position goes against the religious tolerance that “laïcité” is supposed to defend. But the political defence of religious tolerance in France is laughable given that formal restrictions have already been placed on wearing religious symbols.
France has had a long history of political controversies surrounding the hijab, resulting in a legal ban on wearing a hijab in classrooms and government offices in 2004. More worryingly, a recent opinion poll found that two in three French people are in favour of prohibiting parents accompanying children on school trips from wearing visible religious symbols – but this attitude restricts individuals from expressing their true identity.
France became a secular state when it officially separated itself from the church in 1905 to abide by a set of national principles. The country purports to be neutral in matters of religion, therefore not conferring privilege on any particular religion or set of beliefs. However, what the modern French government has failed to realise is that their idea of secularism is restricting human rights, and is now being abused as a shield for discrimination and Islamophobic abuse.
It seems that things have not changed for Muslim women in France since the days of the burqini ban back in 2016, when France started arresting women for wearing full-body swimwear. Even then, the debate was based around France’s constitutional secularism and freedom of religion; unfortunately, the same Trojan horse is being used years later.
It is not up to the French government to restrict women from wearing what they want and from following their faith. Nuns, for example, wear similar clothing and cover their hair; they are respected, and rightly so. Why the double standards when a Muslim woman, for many of the same reasons, chooses to cover her hair due to their own devotion to God? The root of the issue here clearly lies with unresolved Islamophobia.
A uthorities in Sri Lanka on Monday banned women from wearing face veils under an emergency law put in place after deadly Easter Sunday attacks by militants. The measures would help security forces to identify people as a hunt for any remaining
Beijing authorities have ordered halal restaurants and food stalls to remove Arabic script and symbols associated with Islam from their signs, part of an expanding national effort to "Sinicise" its Muslim population.
The Triple Talaq bill criminalising instant divorce in the Muslim community was passed by the Rajya Sabha on Tuesday, with the government mustering numbers for its smooth sailing in the Upper House where it still lacks majority support.
Challenges are a part of life. Whether it’s an individual or a nation, it is how prepared and determined one is to overcome such challenges when they arise that makes the difference.
Most countries which have lockdowns have been able to ensure supplies of basic and essential items to the people. Nevertheless, it is useful for citizens to ensure that they keep adequate inventories of medicines or any special food items that they need.
Will Prime Minister Narendra Modi, in his Independence Day address from the ramparts of New Delhi’s Red Fort, announce that India has developed a COVID-19 cure?
COVID-19 has played a significant role in wealth redistribution. The tech-first companies and founders have got richer, to the tune of billions. At the same time, the physical-first founders (aviation, hospitality and real estate), have been pushed to the bottom of the global rich list.