Political columnist for The Independent.
Political columnist for The Independent.
To get his way at Labour conference, Jeremy Corbyn had to turn his showdown with Labour Remainers at his party’s conference into a loyalty test. Afterwards, many Labour MPs who wanted an unambiguous pro-Remain stance were more pessimistic than ever about the party’s chances of winning an election, or even coming close.
Labour’s Remainers will fight on, saying that pressure to overturn the conference policy will only continue to build in the Parliamentary Labour Party (PLP) and shadow cabinet. They hope it will be tweaked when the election manifesto is eventually decided. But I suspect that now he’s cleared the conference hurdle, Corbyn’s “all things to all people” approach will prevail.
His allies claim that Remainers refuse to take Yes for an answer. Indeed, a year ago, they would have given their left arm for a cast iron pledge of a Final Say referendum with an option to Remain; now, Labour’s centre of gravity has forced Corbyn to give up his anti-referendum position. But he has stuck stubbornly to keeping Leave in the frame so that Labour can “unite the country” – and, crucially, so it can appeal to the Leave voters Boris Johnson is eyeing in the North and Midlands
Yet for all the talk of appealing to as much of the electorate as possible, Labour is now saddled with a policy that many MPs believe will be unsellable on the doorstep.
While the Tories say they will deliver Brexit and the Lib Dems promise to halt it immediately, Labour is stuck in the muddled middle. MPs fear a repeat of the European Parliament elections in May, where Labour fell between the two stools of a polarised country and was roundly beaten into a poor third place.
Corbyn allies point out that Theresa May wanted a Brexit election in 2017, but it turned on other issues such as austerity. Yet the game has moved on, and surely the coming contest will be dominated by Brexit. When Channel 4 News asked voters last week how they would vote in the election, they found that people responded “Leave” and “Remain” rather than named a party.
It is true that Labour can borrow from the traditional Lib Dem playbook and tailor their message to fit different constituencies. Remainer Labour MPs can claim they would stop Brexit via a referendum; Leavers can say Corbyn will negotiate a better Brexit than the Tories.
But coupled with his disastrous personal ratings, Corbyn’s neutral stance on the election’s critical issue might simply look like weakness. He doesn’t even intend to take sides in a referendum. As prime minister, he would allow cabinet ministers to campaign for Remain or Leave while keeping his hands clean to honour the result either way.
This raises the prospect of Sir Keir Starmer negotiating a soft Brexit deal with the EU which he has already pledged to campaign against, along with other senior figures such as John McDonnell, Diane Abbott and Emily Thornberry. No wonder there are doubts at the highest level of the shadow cabinet about the policy backed by the conference.
One crumb of comfort for Labour’s pro-Europeans is that they are confident the party will finally come out for Remain when it holds the now-mooted special one-day conference to decide whether to recommend a Labour deal or Remain in the referendum.
But that could be academic, as it will come after an election that has just got more difficult for Remainers to win. The decision Labour just took will likely make it harder for Remainers to organise tactical voting at the local level. Their fear is that the split in the Remain vote, notably in Conservative-Labour marginals, will ultimately help one man most: Boris Johnson.
Brexit became official Friday at 11 p.m. in London and midnight in Brussels, where the EU is headquartered.
Boris Johnson was “blindsided” by Labour’s refusal to support an early election, I am told. If so, he was not the only one. At the start of last week, Jeremy Corbyn, Ian Blackford of the Scottish
Jeremy Corbyn’s instant verdict on the government’s Brexit proposal is that “it’s worse than Theresa May’s deal”. This may not be right, but it is probably the easiest way to analyse
The United States Senate had passed 51-50, with Vice President Kamala Harris using her tie-breaker vote to pass a $430 billion Inflation Reduction Act, which will create tax credits for clean energy alternatives, including incentives for solar, wind, nuclear power, and for electric cars.
Recently, the circular economy has emerged as a concept that is rapidly gaining significance in several countries, including the UAE.
Eight of the nine Supreme Court justices went to Harvard or Yale law schools. So did nearly a fifth of the federal judiciary. This rankles some politicians, watchdog groups and others who see it as an outrageous manifestation of elitism that needs to be changed, given how much power this small group has over the lives of
Whether one watches Fox News or MSNBC, reads The New York Times or the Wall Street Journal, it has become difficult to view the United States as anything but a game of political dodgeball, with two opposing teams that loath one another trying to knock the other out by whistling partisan fastballs at any vulnerable opponent.