Balloons are released before the start of the 98th running of the Indianapolis 500 at Indianapolis Motorspeedway. File/ Tribune News Service
Elaine S. Povich, Tribune News Service
A colourful balloon floating over the wetlands might look pretty to some visitors, but it upsets Virginia Rettig when she spots one from her office window at the Edwin B. Forsythe National Wildlife Refuge about five miles north of Atlantic City, New Jersey. To her, it looks like litter.
“I just want to go out there and grab it myself,” she said in a phone interview from Galloway Township, where she manages the refuge. “If you would take a walk on the refuge beach, you would gather dozens and dozens of fallen balloons. Every single time you go out on the beach.”
Rettig said she’s frustrated by the public’s lack of understanding about the balloons’ harm when they eventually descend. Wildlife can become tangled in them or can eat the balloon scraps, with sometimes fatal consequences.
“People put them out as decoration and they almost always get away,” Rettig said. “When you are out on the beach or marsh, it’s litter.”
More states are considering banning planned releases of balloons, following the actions of coastal communities such as Ocean City, Maryland, and Nantucket, Mass. Helium balloons, their strings and ties often end up snaring birds or aquatic wildlife, or get swallowed when the animals mistake the latex or foil for food.
But opponents of bans want to keep their traditions at places such as the Indianapolis Motor Speedway — where the release of thousands of balloons to the strains of “Back Home Again in Indiana” has since 1947 signaled the beginning of the Indianapolis 500 car race — and the University of Nebraska, where balloon releases herald the first touchdown of a football game.
Balloon-makers also insist the latex balloons decompose eventually and pose no threat to nature.
At least five states and around a dozen cities have regulations to limit planned balloon releases, including California, Connecticut, Florida, Tennessee and Virginia. None of the laws targets an errant 2-year-old who accidentally lets go of a balloon (and who often ends up in tears). Rather, the laws govern planned releases, usually of around a dozen or more balloons.
Such legislation was introduced in another nine states this year. Of those, five failed, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures. Bills are still pending in Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey and New York.
The Maine legislature considered a balloon-release ban during this year’s session, but the bill died, a victim of an overload of environmental bills, according to one of its sponsors, Democratic state Rep. Lydia Blume. The Maine Senate approved the bill, but it never reached the House floor.
“It’s harmful to our marine species,” Blume said in a phone interview. “We are so reliant on our marine economy in Maine, and lobstermen report seeing balloons everywhere in the ocean. Sea turtles think a busted balloon looks like a squid. We have laws against littering; this is littering from the air.”
Blume said she plans to introduce the bill again next year. Maine Republican state Rep. Peter Lyford said he voted against the bill in committee because “I’ve had a cottage on the ocean for 15 years and I’ve never seen a balloon on it. I didn’t feel we needed another law for something so trivial.”
Danielle Vosburgh, co-founder of Balloons Blow, a group based in Florida that opposes balloon releases, said more people are becoming aware of the problem with latex balloons.
“Most people realize we shouldn’t litter — that’s what balloon releases are, just litter. Just another wasteful single-use product.” She suggests alternatives including paper pompoms, or long ribbon “dancers” that can be waved.
But Lorna O’Hara, executive director of the Balloon Council, an industry group, said the answer is proper handling of balloons, not laws restricting them. She worries that banning balloon releases could lead to banning balloons altogether.
Orbis Research, a marketing firm with offices in Texas and India, reported in July that the worldwide party balloon industry is worth $636 million. Sales grew 7.25% from 2017 to 2018, the market research firm said, and the market is expected to continue growing, to $877 million by 2025.
In the United States, sales also went up, from $127 million in 2017 to $132 million in 2018, the report said. The Balloon Council recommends consumers weight balloons so they can’t fly away, avoid attachments such as plastic clips, and “pin it and bin it” — pop the balloons after use and properly dispose of them.
“We prefer education over legislation,” O’Hara said. “The product is not the culprit; it’s just human behaviour.” The balloon industry says latex balloons are “biodegradable,” meaning they disintegrate over time. Conservation groups disagree.
The Balloon Council cited a 2018 report from a Belgian biotechnology firm, OWS, finding that when balloon material was cut into pieces of 2 millimeters or less and put into soil, biodegradation was “advanced and still proceeding” after 720 days, or nine months.
“Therefore,” the report said, “it can be concluded that material Balloon has the potential to demonstrate 90% relative biodegradation and to be considered biodegradable in soil.”
But anti-balloon activists point out that chopping up a balloon and burying it is not the same as a full balloon landing on the ground. Balloons Blow cited a 1990 report from the Florida Department of Natural Resources finding that while many balloons that reached high altitude burst into bits, many did not, and intact balloons survived on the ground intact for six months. Balloons that deflated and fell into salt water were found to remain intact for at least a year.
Colorado State University chemistry professor Joseph DiVerdi said the question is not whether latex is “biodegradable” but rather how long it takes to degrade and under what conditions. “How does it degrade relative to cellulose?” he said in a phone interview, referring to the fiber that makes up wood and cotton, among other things. “And under whatever conditions are being used. Latex is more resistant to degradation than cellulose.” The University of Nebraska-Lincoln, also under pressure from environmentalists to stop balloon releases, surveyed its students. Over half (51.5%) of the more than 3,800 students surveyed said they wanted to keep the releases, 42.5% said they wanted the tradition to end, and 6% said they didn’t care. Traditionally, the balloons are released over the football stadium after the Cornhuskers score their first touchdown. The practice remains.
“We believe we are using biodegradable balloons, and we had the vote last year and a majority of students voted (in the survey) to support the release, so we didn’t change it,” said Leslie Reed, public affairs director for the university. She said the balloons are 100% latex and have no plastic ties.
But Clemson University in South Carolina last year stopped the tradition started in 1983 of an orange and white balloon release during what the school calls the “most exciting 25 seconds in college football” as the team runs down the hill into the stadium at home games. The school found other jobs for the students who were hired to blow up the balloons.
Back at the wildlife refuge, Rettig said the US Fish and Wildlife Service doesn’t have an official position on balloon releases. But she added, “We want to share with people that we find these in places we wish they weren’t. Any litter is a big concern on any land we are managing for wildlife.”
We know that there is a long way to go before we are successful in reducing the greenhouse gas emissions that warm the planet. But I feel even small environmental campaigns
You’ve seen it before: A driver idling at a stoplight flicks a cigarette butt out the window or a worker during a smoking break drops one to the sidewalk. What you don’t see is what happens to those cigarette butts. Typically, rain sweeps them down storm drains, into local waterways and, eventually, into the Chesapeake
With the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) confirming that last year was the second warmest on record, it is clear that countries across the globe need to do much more to tackle the grave danger
It is sad that the COVID-19 pandemic has battered the air transport sector, landing it in huge turbulence, grounding planes, resulting in layoffs, bankruptcies and rescue plans.
The prime minister will have been proud to see his chief advisor Dominic Cummings adhering wholeheartedly to the advice of his hero, Sir Winston Churchill, to never surrender.
When Chinese engineers flew home in January for the Lunar New Year, few in Africa would have imagined that a coronavirus outbreak was about to ground planes, upend supply lines and freeze work on dozens of Chinese-built roads, railways, ports and power stations.
“Do as I say not as I do” is an infuriating attitude at the best of times. Now, when there is such emoting about sacrifices, obeying instructions to save lives and praise of unprecedented heroism spouting from our leaders, it’s doubly insulting to see them act so irresponsibly.