Barack Obama and Donald Trump.
President Donald Trump this week repeated a falsehood he’s pushed several times before, that President Obama had a policy of separating migrant families at the US-Mexico border and that Trump had ended the practice.
To put it into fast-food context, that’s a quadruple whopper, with extra cheese. During the Obama administration, family separations were rare and predicated upon two conditions: whether border officials felt the parents or guardians posed a threat to the children, or whether the adults, under US immigration law, had to be detained based on prior criminal convictions.
Standard procedure, both in the civil immigration context and in the domestic criminal justice context, is to not incarcerate children with adults (yes, there are exceptions). So when the Obama administration jailed an adult migrant, the minor was separated not as a part of a separations policy but as part of a policy to not jail children with adults. And to avoid just such separations, the adult detentions were rare. “Obama generally refrained from prosecution in cases involving adults who crossed the border with their kids,” Peter Margulies, an immigration law expert at Roger Williams University School of Law, told Politifact last year.
How is that different from Trump’s approach? Well, under former Attorney General Jeff Sessions, the government adopted a “zero tolerance” policy for dealing with people crossing the border without permission. In short, they charged as many adults as they could with a misdemeanor count of illegal entry (crossing the border without permission), then chose to jail them purposefully to force the family separation as a deterrence tactic.
The plan was to arrest border-crossing parents — the vast majority of whom were exercising a legal right to seek asylum — and charge them with a crime, something previous administrations did not generally do. And then the policy was to detain the adults rather than issuing a citation and releasing them, thus leading to the family separation. All of this was aimed at imposing draconian punishment on those who arrived at the border to serve as a warning to others who might follow.
And yes, it was as inhumane as it sounds. As The Times editorial board wrote Tuesday morning, “that was a policy so vile and destructive that even Trump, who has no shame, was eventually shamed into ending it.”
But not so shamed that Trump’s given up on the canard of blaming Obama for it. This is what he told reporters gathered to witness his meeting in the White House on Tuesday with Egyptian President Abdel Fattah Sisi: “Just so you understand, President Obama separated the children,” Trump said, then referred to images of children in cages shared on social media posts that erroneously tied them to the Trump administration. “Those cages that were shown — I think they were very inappropriate — they were built by President Obama’s administration not by Trump. President Obama had child separation. Take a look. The press knows it. You know it. We all know it.... I’m the one who stopped it. President Obama had child separation.” Trump went on to endorse family separations as a deterrent though said he didn’t intend to bring them back (the courts might have a say in that), and then bizarrely claimed that “President Obama has the law, we changed the law, and I think the press should accurately report it.”
Um, OK, what law did Trump change? I’d be happy to report on it. Invoking the images of cages was a classic shift-the-focus ploy by Trump. The issue at hand isn’t cages but family separations, which the previous administration rarely did and which the current administration embraced as an aggressive response to people asking the US government for help.
And the separations issue wasn’t the only lie he told in that short encounter. He repeated the falsehood that “we have the worst (immigration laws) of any country in the world,” claimed that “we are building a lot of wall” (in truth, just replacing some existing sections), and accused the Democrats of wanting open borders (they don’t).
That’s a lot of whoppers.
When Mitch McConnell blocked President Barack Obama’s choice to fill a Supreme Court vacancy in March 2016, he claimed he wanted to “let the American people decide” in November elections eight months later.
For more than two years President Donald Trump has talked about pulling the United States out of the landmark Paris climate agreement. Starting on Monday he finally can do something about it.
The court said the rule, which requires most immigrants who want asylum to first seek safe haven in a third country through which they traveled on their way to the United States, could go into effect as litigation challenging its legality continues.
It looks like that former US President Donald Trump is more in the news than his successor in the White House, Joe Biden. Trump’s major first trouble after his presidency ended with his electoral defeat was on January 6, 2021, which he had addressed, attacked the Capitol in Washington, which houses the US Congress
Gun politics in the US demonstrates that a popular majority does not always get its way. Even though most Americans support stricter gun-safety laws, proposals for major new regulations reliably face impassable obstacles in Congress. The standard explanation for this impasse is that the minority is highly mobilised and
In the modern world, when conflicts turn hot, they also turn complicated. When one country invades another, it is not uncommon for it to end up with less, not more, than when it started. Not that long ago, capitalism and communism were engaged in what really should have been a straightforward existential struggle,
It’s the Holy Month of Ramadan. It’s a prime desire of every Muslim to perform Umrah in the Blessed Month of Ramdan. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation has urged Umrah pilgrims to register themselves in “Nusuk” application (“UAE urges Umrah pilgrims to register in ‘Nusuk’ application