This is not a faraway dispute in lands of which we know little. It is something of great significance to every internationally open economy, such as Britain, which relies heavily on international trade to maintain its standard of living.
The China-US nexus is the key dual economic relationship on Earth today, obviously dwarfing the UK-EU spat. If China and the US had continued with their tit-for-tat imposition of tariff and quota barriers on trade it would have created a downward spiral for global growth that might have run out of control. As in the 1930s, when the great economic powers pursued competitive devaluation and protectionism, the US-China spat ran the severe risk of tilting the world into a protracted depression.
Good news, then: after almost a year of dispute, their trade war is coming to an end. And with that comes a fresh opportunity to “fix” the woeful economic relationship between the world’s two largest economies: the United States and China.
Donald Trump meets the Chinese vice premier Liu He at the White House to put the finishing touches to a new deal between the superpowers. If successful, it should swiftly lead to a summit between Trump and Xi Jinping to sign everything off and enjoy a jolly nice banquet.
The profile of the deal is impressively simple. The Chinese contract to buy lots of American goods by 2025. Beijing is also supposed to allow US corporations more freedom to buy Chinese enterprises, rather than be restricted to non-controlling equity stakes and state-sanctioned joint ventures. The recent controversies surrounding software giant Huawei highlight how sensitive some sectors can be to such foreign interventions.
The deal will get Trump off China’s back and see their growth tick up again with a boost to confidence. It will help Trump by creating US jobs, just as he promised in his 2016 election campaign. There are plenty of criticisms that can be made about the deal – it is effectively distorting market forces – and there are doubts about whether China will deliver too. But for now it is one of the few signs of hope on the global economic scene.
The Trump administration gambled, and at least partially won; it should be given some credit for that. It seems to have been a product of the typical Trump way of “negotiating” – start a fight, throw out some insulting tweets and then magnanimously offer to make peace. This must be the way to get ahead in the Manhattan real estate market. In any case, it is a big, beautiful deal the president has won.
It is too easily forgotten that the financial crash of 2008 and the global recession that followed had its origins in the incomprehensibly large trade deficits the Americans ran with China, and the correspondingly unfeasible quantity of US government debt that had been accumulated by the authorities in Beijing. These global imbalances fuelled the unsustainable lending practices of western banks, particularly into the property sector.
Behind that was a number of disputed factors, but undeniable was the simple reality that the Chinese were able to manufacture anything from smartphones and dog food to “Make America Great Again” baseball caps at considerably less cost than the US. Throw in a bit of currency manipulation – keeping the Chinese yuan down to ensure exports were competitive – and you have China’s impressive growth record.
Now, though, the two sides have peered over the abyss of a potential decade-long economic war of attrition and drawn back from the brink. There is, perhaps, a lesson there for Brexit too.
The president showed up suddenly at the wedding party of Nicole Marie and PJ Mongelli, which was in full swing.
For starters, I would like to say a few words in defence of Attorney General William Barr. He is being much maligned, even vilified, as a mumbling, bumbling, dissembling, lying apologist for President Donald Trump. And I just want to note for the record that America’s 85th attorney general
Former Vice President Joe Biden is trying to reassure voters. Like former President Obama, he is promising that “If you like your health plan, your employer-based plan, you can keep it.” Don’t bet on it. Some presidential candidates support directly outlawing private health plans, and replacing them with a single-payer, government-run health plan.
Wednesday’s congressional hearings with former special counsel Robert Mueller revealed no new facts, because Mueller predictably stuck to the contents of his report during his testimony. But that doesn’t mean his appearance was a waste of time. For one thing, few Americans have had the time to study
Conflicts take a toll on people, but children suffer both physically and emotionally. In Africa, in particular in Ethiopia’s troubled Tigray region, their predicament is extremely precarious. A new revelation from Unicef is very disheartening. It says over 100,000
Former President Donald Trump’s highly sought-after endorsement has not provided quite the boost some Republicans expected so far this year. Republican candidates backed by Trump are locked in crowded primary races against undeterred opponents.
Two decades ago, a Goldman Sachs executive coined the label BRICs to describe four big emerging nations: Brazil, Russia, India and China. Rapid growth and expansion of the ranks of the wealthy in these countries vindicated the faith of investors. Their leaders
COVID-19 has been an earthquake along the already fraught fault lines of global education. The result is a deep chasm into which the most vulnerable have fallen: 1.6 billion children were out of education at the height of school closures. If we do not act now