US completes withdrawal from World Health Organisation

The US has finalised its withdrawal from the World Health Organisation (WHO), one year after President Donald Trump announced America was ending its 78-year-old commitment, federal officials said . But it's hardly a clean break.

The US owes about $280 million to the global health agency, according to WHO. And Trump administration officials acknowledge that they haven't finished working out some issues, such as lost access to data from other countries that could give America an early warning of a new pandemic.

The withdrawal will hurt the global response to new outbreaks and will hobble the ability of U.S. scientists and pharmaceutical companies to develop vaccines and medicines against new threats, said Lawrence Gostin, a public health law expert at Georgetown University.

"In my opinion, it’s the most ruinous presidential decision in my lifetime,” he said.

The WHO is the United Nations’ specialised health agency and is mandated to coordinate the response to global health threats, such as outbreaks of mpox, Ebola and polio. It also provides technical assistance to poorer countries; helps distribute scarce vaccines, supplies and treatments; and sets guidelines for hundreds of health conditions, including mental health and cancer.

Nearly every country in the world is a member.

US officials helped lead the WHO's creation, and America has long been among the organisation's biggest donors, providing hundreds of millions of dollars and hundreds of staffers with specialised public health expertise.

On average, the US pays $111 million a year in member dues to the WHO and roughly $570 million more in annual voluntary contributions, according to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

'MISHANDLING OF COVID-19'

In an executive order issued right after taking office, Trump said the US was withdrawing from WHO due to the organisation’s mishandling of the COVID-19 pandemic and other global health crises. He also cited the agency’s "failure to adopt urgently needed reforms” and its "inability to demonstrate independence from the inappropriate political influence of WHO member states.”

WHO, like other public health organisations, made costly mistakes during the pandemic, including at one point advising people against wearing masks. It also asserted that COVID-19 wasn’t airborne, a stance it didn’t officially reverse until 2024.

Another Trump administration complaint: None of WHO's chief executives - there have been nine since the organisation was created in 1948 - have been Americans. Administration officials view that as unfair given how much the WHO relies on US financial contributions and on US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention personnel.

Experts say the US exit could cripple numerous global health initiatives, including the effort to eradicate polio, maternal and child health programs, and research to identify new viral threats.

Dr Ronald Nahass, president of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, called the U.S. withdrawal "shortsighted and misguided” and "scientifically reckless.”

The US has ceased official participation in WHO-sponsored committees, leadership bodies, governance structures and technical working groups. That would seem to include the WHO group that assesses what flu strains are circulating and makes critical decisions about updating flu shots.

It also signals the US is no longer participating in global flu information-sharing that guides vaccine decisions.

Such disease intelligence has helped Americans be "at the front of the line” when new outbreaks occur and new vaccines and medicines are quickly needed to counteract them and save lives, Gostin said.

Trump administration officials say they already have public health relationships with many countries and are working to ensure direct sharing of that kind of information, rather than having WHO serve as a middleman. But US officials did not give specifics about how many such arrangements are in place.

Associated Press