Germany's Court will begin considering a new challenge to a law banning assisted suicide services. File/AFP
Germany’s highest court will begin hearing on Tuesday a case brought by terminally ill patients and doctors against a law banning professional assisted suicide services, reopening a bitter debate.
Lawmakers had passed the so-called Paragraph 217 in November 2015, which penalises anyone who turns assisted suicide into a professional service — with or without payment.
But a Leipzig administrative court’s ruling two years later, in 2017, raised questions about the law, as judges found that in extreme cases, the authorities could not refuse life-ending medication to terminally ill patients.
The contradictory signals have fuelled renewed debate on an issue that has huge resonance in a fast-ageing country where the Church still exerts strong influence.
It is also a particularly sensitive subject as the Nazis had used what they called “euthanasia” to exterminate around 200,000 disabled people.
From Tuesday, the Federal Constitutional Court will begin considering the latest challenge brought by six plaintiffs — among them terminally ill patients, doctors and associations that provide support to people seeking assisted suicide.
In practice, the 2015 law means that a husband who helps his terminally ill wife to die would not be prosecuted.
But an association or a business that repeatedly offered to help people die would face prosecution.
The situation is also not so clear-cut for doctors who prescribe deadly cocktails to patients.
In their case before the constitutional court, the patients argue that their general personal right extends to their right to a self-determined death.
The medical practitioners are meanwhile seeking legal certainty in cases when they are required to prescribe palliative medication.
Right to self-responsible death
Doctor Matthias Thoens told news agency DPA that since the law came into force, he has been worried he could be charged if any of his patients were to abuse the palliative drugs he had prescribed.
“If someone took his own life without my knowledge or will, I’d be the subject of an investigation,” he said.
But he said he had brought the challenge also because he felt it would be “criminal to leave such patients on their own.”
As his fellow plaintiff and doctor, Michael de Ridder, wrote in the Die Zeit weekly: “There is not only a right to life, but also a right to self-determined death.”
The associations among the plaintiffs meanwhile charge that the law has essentially also banned them from being there to support their members in their last days.
Ahead of the hearing, the Catholic Church piled on the pressure, with Berlin’s Archbishop Heiner Koch warning the court against “shifting the value system” in Germany.
The court should “send a strong signal for the protection of lives,” he told the Funke newspaper group.
Amid the controversy, the authorities were also waiting for the court to deliver clarity.
Since the Leipzig court’s ruling in 2017, more than 100 applicants have written the Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices for medication to end their lives.
Under Health Minister Jens Spahn’s order, none of the applications has been approved pending the latest court challenge.
“Anything else would mean that bureaucrats, or in the end I as a minister, would decide who gets to die with state help and who doesn’t,” Spahn told the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung daily.
Euthanasia is officially legal in only three countries in Europe — the Netherlands, Belgium and Luxembourg — but others allow or tolerate a form of assisted suicide.
In Switzerland, as well as in the US states of Vermont, Oregon and Washington for example, assisted suicide is legal.
Painters, sculptors and photographers face losing their workspaces because of gentrification in the booming capital. All 30 artists in the building have received a notice to vacate the premises they have used since 2013.
BERLIN: Dutch central bank Governor Klaas Knot expects the eurozone economy to recover speed in the second half after a sluggish start to the year, but in an interview with Handelsblatt the noted hawk was distinctly dovish on long-term interest rates. Knot, one of the most prominent hawks on the European Central Bank’s rate-setting committee told the German paper
As the United Kingdom grapples with its Brexit drama, the uncertainty around its decision to leave the EU persuaded Dale Carr to close down her Berlin shop selling British goods. The 67-year-old from Sheffield and her husband Robin in 1996 opened “Broken English”, a shop selling British goods to homesick expats and Germans with a taste for UK treats in the trendy district of Kreuzberg.
The unlucky thief tried to hide under a shelf but the old man discovered him and beat him with a broomstick.
Ijaz Hussain, a 56-year-old Pakistani, considers UAE as his home. All the UAE’s national events are as close to his heart as the those of his country. His family celebrates all of them.
The Dubai Court of Appeal upheld a ruling by the Court of First Instance, sentencing a gang of three Asians to three months in jail to be followed by deportation after being convicted of attempting to steal electrical cables of an estimated value of Dhs50,000 from the warehouses of a trading company.