Columnists and broadcaster.
Columnists and broadcaster.
A view of inside a stock market.
Quite suddenly the R-word, recession, has reared up on the world counts. Last week, a sudden wave of fear ripped through the financial markets, with the bond markets giving a signal that we should expect an economic downturn in the coming months.
There are several elements here. US bond prices rose, or looked round the other way, long-term US interest rates fell, so that the interest rate on 10-year bonds fell below that of three-month Treasury bills. The interest rates on German 10-year bonds, dubbed bunds, actually went negative. The US Federal Reserve changed its guidance on the future movements of interest rates, suggesting that it might well not increase rates this year.
And a few days earlier, the European Central Bank announced it would continue its version of quantitative easing, pumping more money into the European banking system. If all this sounds excessively technical, all the rest of us need to know is that the world’s two main central banks, and the markets, think there is a real danger of recession.
Are they right? Deep breath. Well of course no one can know, but there are some things that can sensibly be said about this economic cycle. The first is that there is such a thing as the global economic cycle, with economies speeding up then slowing down, and the duration of that cycle seems to be between seven and 10 years. If you take the last trough as 2009, we are now 10 years into the growth phase, so you would expect some sort of turndown soon.
To ask why there should be any turndown is to ask whether there should be a cycle at all. I cannot give a satisfactory answer to that, except to observe that in good times people get carried away and assume everything will go on for ever, and vice versa. Let’s just accept that both booms and slumps eventually come to an end.
Elements that might end the present growth phase include international trade tensions, shortages of labour, excessive debts, inflated asset prices. Right now there are plenty of trade tensions, tight labour markets in a number of economies, including the US, Germany and the UK, a fall-off of growth in China (thanks to excessive debts), and inflated share price in high-tech America – though the last of those have been to some extent corrected since the autumn.
I think the second thing to say is that all these negatives are within the bounds of what is normal. You get a clutch of negative features that might herald a downturn at the top of every boom. The difficult thing to figure out is whether there is something happening that is at the outer edges of our experience – experience, that is, of the past century or so of the economic cycle.
The banking crisis of 2008 was at the outer edges, in that nothing like it had occurred since the 1930s. The dotcom boom of 1998-9 on the other hand was a “normal” burst of euphoria. Of course, people can argue about what is normal. The threat of a trade war between the world’s largest and second largest economies is not normal in the sense that we have not had anything quite like the clash between the US and China before.
But some sort of accommodation will be reached, and even if it doesn’t, it would not be big enough to unseat the entire world economy.
A lot of people worry about the present build-up of debt, but overall, debt levels worldwide are a lot lower than they were at the end of the Second World War and that was a start of long, if bumpy, period of international growth.
So what is unusual about this cycle? The obvious stand-out is that at the top of the boom, the developed world has low, or even negative, interest rates. But to me that signals something about the next pick-up, which will I fear be very muted, rather than the forthcoming downturn. I am less worried about a serious worldwide recession next year (though there will probably be a mild one) than stagnation through the 2020s afterwards.
But even that is counterintuitive given the burst of technological innovation taking place now. Bottom line: yes, there will be a downturn and probably next year. But it won’t be anything like as bad as the recession of 2008-9.
With the UN refugee agency indicating that a record 71 million people have now been displaced worldwide by war, persecution and other violence, the world community cannot anymore afford to turn a blind eye to the crucial issue. Collective and effective global measures to tackle the root causes of displacements
Bernie Sanders can’t decide what socialism is. At times he frames it as nothing more than New Deal-style capitalism, not so different from the Scandinavian economies of Norway, Sweden or Denmark. Other times he defines it in the language of class struggle, vowing to smash “the oligarchy”
Nobel laureate economist Amartya Sen repeatedly said that for the development of the country, primary necessity is primary health and education services. If health is not given importance then a country or a nation cannot prosper. The backbone of a country is the development of these two.
Sandwiched in the middle of a row between Phil and Sharon Mitchell that’s been running since before the Maastricht Treaty, and a dystopian hell dream drama about the imminent collapse of human civilisation, it wasn’t quite clear where in the BBC schedules the Tory Leadership Debate either started or finished.