The ‘transformational’ special needs plan for children

James Moore, The Independent

Here’s what you need to know about the situation faced by children with special educational needs and disabilities (SEND) and their parents as the government publishes what it claims will be a “transformational” programme of change: the law as it stands is pretty good.

The Children and Families Act of 2014 does a fine job of spelling out what is required to secure an Education Health and Care Plan (EHCP), what should be provided through it, and how its progress should be monitored.

The problem is that the law is routinely flouted.

Local authorities, which have the job of conducting assessments and making decisions, routinely trample on families, while shamefully demeaning the parents who take up the cudgels to fight for them as “pushy” and “middle class”. Apparently, standing up for your child and being a loving parent makes you a villain in county hall.

Central government, the Treasury, and the Department for Education (DfE) bear a heavy responsibility for having allowed this situation to develop into a full blown family-wrecking crisis by starving the sector of funds. But now we have the shiny new change programme. So does this mean our kids will finally receive the help they need? And that they are legally entitled to? I feel we should repeat that. Does this mean that the 2014 Act is going to be respected? Wait, is that a top I see on the table spinning at the speed of light in the DfE press office?

It is. Because there is a whole lot of spin here.

As a parent with a long and bitter personal experience of a failing special needs system, my snap reaction having read the announcement was: Is that it? Is the really the best you can do after all those reviews, and consultations, and more consultations, and humming and hawing as education secretaries have walked in and out of the revolving doors at the DfE?

There will be, we are told, “guidelines for professionals”? But why are they needed when we already have the act?

There is the promise of 33 new special “free” schools, which serves to highlight the failures of too many mainstream schools with regardless to inclusion. But they’re years away.

There will be some more inspections, and recalcitrant schools with their eyes on league tables (an under-reported cause of problems) will be hassled into being more inclusive. Yeah, yeah, yeah. Oh, and we’re going to digitise the ECHP application process to make it easier and less “adversarial”? That sounds nice. Except that we all know that digitisation can be a double edged sword. It can make things quicker and more efficient. It can also be used as a means of locking parents out and leaving them in the cold when there are disputes and things go awry.

The troubling focus on “mediation” in the event of the latter happening remains the DfE’s perferred solution for reducing the adversarial nature of the EHCP application process. It will do nothing of the sort. I’ve twice sat through mediation sessions: they are a joke. Whether to grant an EHCP or not is a binary decision. What no one has yet explained to me is how you mediate between yes and no. The local authority comes in, states its position. You state yours. Then it says “no”.

If you’re lucky, it might suggest that you resubmit your application or provide more evidence, which you don’t need mediation for. If they’re worried about you appealing, they might even send in a lawyer. This happened to us, when we were preparing to do just that. Although we were told they weren’t appearing as a lawyer. They were there as a council employee. Things that make you go hmm.

The most bitterly amusing part of the plans is all the talk about “early intervention”. Early intervention is a wonderful idea. In theory it could save parents from desperately wading through sludge in an attempt to get their children what they need, from submitting form after form, from complaining, writing endless letters to councillors and MPs. Problems could be addressed before turning nasty.