Climate issue could determine Australian election

Kate Lamb, Reuters

After some of the worst fires and floods ever to hit Australia, a new cohort of climate-conscious independents are threatening to shake up the federal election on Saturday, putting the government under pressure in key districts and potentially reshaping the country’s political landscape. Enraged by the lack of government action on climate change, the candidates are campaigning hard on environmental issues in the hope of wooing moderate voters away from the major parties. “There is deep frustration that real action hasn’t been taken on climate  change,” said Allegra Spender, 44, an independent candidate in the wealthy Sydney electoral district of Wentworth. “It’s become ideological rather than based on science and business, and that’s what people are seeking: just a rational, proportional response to the evidence.”

Spender, a former analyst with McKinsey & Co, is one of more than 20 independent candidates, predominately women, who are running for seats in traditionally conservative, mostly urban districts, and who draw some of their funding from climate 200, a fund set up three years ago to back candidates looking to advance climate policy.

About half a dozen of these candidates have come to be known as the “teal independents,” reflecting the combination of their appeal to ‘blue’ moderate liberals and ‘green’ stance on climate change.

Opinion polls show the group is gaining traction among voters with their environmental, anti-corruption and gender equality policies, posing a threat to the established parties which have trodden lightly around the climate issue for fear of alienating voters in a country that is one of the world’s largest exporters of coal and gas.

Liberal Party leader Scott Morrison, who became prime minister in August 2018, seems likely to lose power at the election, ending nine years of conservative government. A poll conducted last week suggested the Labor Party would win 80 seats, more than the 76 needed for majority government. The poll showed the current government could be reduced to 63 seats with the remaining eight seats won by minor parties and independents. If the polls are wrong, as they were at the last election, a hung parliament where independents hold the balance of power is possible. Treasurer Josh Frydenberg — the country’s most senior finance minister and widely seen as the next leader of the Liberal Party — is in danger of losing his Melbourne seat of Kooyong to a teal independent, neurologist Monique Ryan, according to a recent poll. Another independent, former journalist Zoe Daniel, is leading a poll in her Melbourne seat. Spender appears to be attracting voters across the spectrum in Wentworth, which includes Bondi and some of the country’s most affluent harbourside areas.

“Climate change,” said 36-year-old Jess Daniel, when asked about her top priority after casting an early ballot in Bondi. “I have a little one and I am thinking of him, not just the here and now.” After 58 years of voting conservative, Ian Tresise has donned the teal T-shirt and joined Spender’s army of 1,000 volunteers.

“The world’s going to be cooked at 3 degrees,” he told Reuters, referring to global warming, as he handed out flyers at a Bondi pre-polling booth. “It’s getting pretty cooked at 1.5.” The goal of the Paris Agreement, which came into force in 2016, is to limit global warming to below 2 degrees Celsius, preferably to 1.5 degrees, compared to pre-industrial levels. A survey published by the Lowy Institute independent think-tank last May showed that concern over climate change is rising, with 60% of Australians agreeing that “global warming is a serious and pressing problem,” up from 56% the year before. But away from the big cities, in areas which have experienced some of the country’s worst natural disasters in the last few years, opinions remain deeply divided.

In Conjola, a quiet holiday town on the south coast of New South Wales, some doubt climate change has anything to do with the fires that ripped through the town in the so-called “Black Summer” of 2019-2020, or the floods that followed weeks after, and again in recent months. The fires came after Australia’s hottest and driest year on record.

“These days we sneeze and its climate change,” said Barry, 59, who witnessed the Conjola fires. He asked to use his first name only, for fear of being targeted by climate activists. For some in Conjola, as in the nation’s coal and gas heartlands, distrust of climate science is fused with concerns over jobs and rising living costs, which opinion polls show are still the most important issues for voters. Inflation hit a 20-year high in the first three months of the year, and voters are feeling the pinch as interest rates start to rise.

The fossil fuel industry is a significant employer in every Australian state. Mining accounts for 11.5% of the country’s economic output and fossil fuels make up about a quarter of total exports, according to Australia’s central bank.

“It’s a climate change election in that I want to vote for the government that is going to do the least,” said Barry. “Because closing coal-fired powered stations is going to cost jobs.” Another Conjola resident, Samantha Kneeshaw, a high school science teacher who survived the fires by jumping in her pool with a scuba tank, said climate was the most important issue for her in the upcoming election. “It is going to cause rack and ruin for so many people,” she said. “I cannot fathom this government getting back in again and not doing anything, because Australia is so crucial to this climate debate.”

To achieve the Paris Agreement goal of keeping global warming under 2 degrees, the Intergovernmental Panel on climate Change says the world needs to cut greenhouse gas emissions by 50% by 2030 and reach net zero by 2050.

Australia is well below that and was branded a “holdout” by United Nations Secretary-General Antonio Guterres in March. At global climate change talks in Glasgow last year, Australia refused to commit to phasing out coal or increase its carbon emission reduction targets.

Morrison’s coalition government has pledged to reduce emissions by 26% to 28% below 2005 levels by 2030 and hit net zero emissions by 2050, among the least ambitious of developed nations. But divisions within conservative ranks have raised questions over their commitment to the targets. In April, one Nationals senator in Queensland declared the government’s net-zero 2050 target “dead.”

After years of climate wars, many of Australia’s politicians have shied away from promoting renewable energy or trying to wean the country off fossil fuels for fear of a backlash from industry and some voters. On the campaign trail, Deputy Prime Minister Barnaby Joyce, the leader of the Nationals, said he would not use the term “transition” applied to a move to cleaner energy as it “equals unemployment.” The opposition Labor Party is only slightly more ambitious, pledging a 43% reduction in emissions by 2030.

That has given the teal independents room to campaign on much more aggressive emissions targets. The group has already had an impact on the country’s politics, and has put establishment parties on the defensive.

New South Wales treasurer and energy minister Matt Kean, representing the Liberal Party, warned voters specifically not to vote for the teal candidates running against progressive Liberal Party candidates.