Political columnist for The Independent.
Political columnist for The Independent.
People protest outside Parliament in London.
“While admitting there would be some short-term disruption, the prime minister insisted Britain had a bright future ahead of it. She announced that the government would provide financial help to businesses and farmers hit by new tariffs. But supermarkets and drug companies warned that shortages of food and medicines were inevitable.
“In Parliament Square, supporters of Brexit cheered as Big Ben struck 11 o’clock. But police intervened amid angry clashes with pro-European campaigners, and there were 12 arrests. A petition calling for the UK to rejoin the EU has already attracted six million signatures...”
Well, it could have happened. We should be grateful that it didn’t. May, spooked by the fear that crashing out of the EU might see Scotland and Northern Ireland crash out of the UK, decided that no deal was not better than her bad deal after all. And the EU, not wanting the blame for a disruptive no-deal exit, extended the UK’s membership by six months.
There is cause for relief, but not celebration. The battle to prevent a cliff-edge departure has not been won, only postponed. Could the Conservatives become the “no-deal party” by the new deadline of 31 October? It’s perfectly possible and here’s how.
May will almost certainly not be prime minister by then. If, as looks likely, she fails in her fourth attempt to win commons approval for her withdrawal agreement, she will surely have run out of road. Cabinet ministers and Tory backbenchers would prise her out of No 10. She might try to bow out with some dignity by acting as caretaker prime minister while her party elects her successor.
The Tory leadership contest would be a competition to take the hardest line on Brexit. Some cabinet ministers have already auditioned by advertising their no-deal credentials. Last month, 157 Tory MPs – half of their ranks – voted to leave the EU today without a deal. The furious reaction by Eurosceptics to reports that the government has shelved no-deal planning shows their determination to keep the option alive. (Ministers have halted “imminent” plans but insist they continue long-term work.)
Tory MPs whittle down the runners to a shortlist of two, who go into a ballot of the party’s 120,000 members – the 0.26 per cent of the electorate who will choose our next prime minister. Surveys by the ConservativeHome website suggest 75 per cent of the members want a no-deal departure, so candidates might be easily tempted down that road. They would doubtless pledge to renegotiate the withdrawal agreement and change the Irish backstop. If they tried that as prime minister, the EU would surely rebuff it; a no-deal exit might be their next move.
There’s another way no-deal could happen. The EU’s patience with the UK is wearing thin. I was struck at Wednesday’s Brussels summit by the exasperation of UK allies such as Mark Rutte, prime minister of the Netherlands.
If Westminster were still deadlocked in October, a further Article 50 extension could not be taken for granted. The EU will have had more time to plan for no deal. Emmanuel Macron might win more support than he did this week for what French sources call “cutting off the rotten branch” of Britain, by now led by a Brexiteer. Donald Tusk and Jean-Claude Juncker, who favour a conciliatory approach, will be heading for the exit door. Angela Merkel’s influence is already on the wane.
So it will probably fall to MPs to ensure we never get to the cliff edge again. Rather than order the government to revoke Article 50, they should take the more democratic route of a Final Say referendum.
British lawmakers endorsed Prime Minister Theresa May’s request to the European Union (EU) to delay Brexit until June 30 at a vote in parliament on Tuesday, adding weight to the pitch she will make to EU leaders in Brussels.
When the prime minister applied for and got a second extension to the Article 50 period, she did so because she wanted to save the country from the disastrous consequences of leaving the EU without a deal. She did the right thing, putting the country first.
Elections can be energising, they can be bruising, and over the past few years the public have been to the ballot box far more often than expected.
It is only just beginning to sink in how disastrous Theresa May’s failure is for the Conservative Party. The opinion polls have recorded huge drops in Tory support. The most recent from ComRes put the Tories on 23 per cent, which may be an outlier but there is no reason why they should not fall further.
While many nations are just starting to think about utilisation of smart technologies and artificial intelligence (AI), the UAE has been fortunate, thanks to visionary leadership, to have already made rapid strides and lead the digitisation race in the region.
President Donald Trump has long said the goal of his trade policy is simply to get better deals for Americans. But as the trade war intensifies, it seems increasingly likely that his policies will lead to something more: a lasting break with China and a new alignment of global power.
There is a story about an enthusiastic American who took a phlegmatic English friend to see the Niagara Falls. “Isn’t that amazing?” exclaimed the American. “Look at that vast mass of water dashing over that enormous cliff!”
I never thought “voter suppression” would be a phrase that I’d ever associate with British politics. Unfortunately, the events witnessed on European Election polling day, which left registered European citizens unable to vote, leave me struggling to find the adequate words to describe how much of a mess it was.